| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
270013
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
NEW DELHI, National Institue of Public Finance and Policy, 1995.
|
| Description |
Paperback Volume
|
| Series |
National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi. Working Paper Series
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper analyses the responses of the three allocative criteria for federal fiscal transfer to states, namely, the distance criterion, the inverse-income criterion and the integrated criterion to the changes in per capita income and/or population size of a participating State.
|
| Standard Number |
GIPE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| G00099 | NIPFP/GL/95/2/G00099 | Main | On Shelf | NOT FOR ISSUE | Rack1 Shelf1 |
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
263864
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
NEW DELHI, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, Jan 1991.
|
| Description |
Composite Document
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Working Paper No. 1
|
| Standard Number |
GIPE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| G00028 | NIPFP/GL/91/1-/G00028 | Main | On Shelf | NOT FOR ISSUE | Rack1 Shelf1 |
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
262614
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
NEW DELHI, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, Jul 1990.
|
| Description |
Composite Document
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Working Paper No. 7
|
| Standard Number |
GIPE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| G00022 | NIPFP/GL/90/7-/G00022 | Main | On Shelf | NOT FOR ISSUE | Rack1 Shelf1 |
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
262699
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Current Policy Issue No. 28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
364227
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper suggests modification of the constant rate-base method of estimating elasticity based on data grouped by income classes, and quantifies the effect of a change in inequality in the distribution of income on the yield of personal income tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
263879
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Working Paper No. 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
263882
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Working Paper No. 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
262528
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Working Paper No. 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
212114
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
NEW DELHI, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, 2001.
|
| Description |
108p.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
|
| Standard Number |
81-241-0763-7 GIPE Pur..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 256842 | X7291.2.P1/P1/256842 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
262766
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
NEW DELHI, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, Jan 1994.
|
| Description |
Composite Document
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Working Paper No.1/94
|
| Standard Number |
GIPE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| G00023 | NIPFP/GL/94/1-/G00023 | Main | On Shelf | NOT FOR ISSUE | Rack1 Shelf1 |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
364210
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper examines the role of population as a determinant of the overall progressivity of the transfer mechanism and the implications of using dated data relating to population in the revenue dispensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
264039
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Working Paper No. 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
114244
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
NEW DELHI, National Institute of Pubulic Finance and Poilcy, 1983.
|
| Description |
101p27+ cm
|
| Standard Number |
GIPE Gift.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 217812 | XM5,72:50bY:4:67.2.N8/M3/217812 | Main | On Shelf | General | Rack1 Shelf1 |
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
364222
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This paper analyses the relationship between the exemption limit in the personal income tax and the per capita income for a group of 26 selected countries. It is seen that the actual exemption limit and the marginal tax rates at low levels of income are high in India, Pakistan, Jamaica and Spain and low in U.S.A. and Thailand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|